Restore The Fourth

Opposing unconstitutional mass government surveillance

  • We Have A Right To Breathe, Your Honor

    “I can’t breathe.” That was what Eric Garner said, and what George Floyd said, and what many more Americans have said when seized and restrained

    Learn More
  • Libertarian, Green Nominees Weigh In on Surveillance and Privacy

    Restore The Fourth interviewed Libertarian Party nominee Jo Jorgensen and Green Party nominee Howie Hawkins on privacy and surveillance topics. We asked the Biden and

    Learn More
    photo of Libertarian Party nominee Jo Jorgensen and of Green Party nominee Howie Hawkins
  • Our Platform To Reduce Police Violence

    The United States is in the middle of a pandemic of racist police violence that shows no sign of abating. For many police officers, expressing

    Learn More
  • Beware of Governments Bearing Contact Tracing Apps

    Providing hospital personnel and the general public with enough tests, masks and hand soap is hard. In-person contact tracing is expensive and risky for the

    Learn More
  • Restore the Fourth, 18 Allies Ask Congress To Investigate FBI Monitoring

    The essence of the Fourth Amendment is that the government should leave you and your stuff alone, unless they can satisfy a judge that they

    Learn More

Call Your Senators Now: PATRIOT Act Renewal Cloture Vote TODAY

Our freedoms are at risk.

Just last Thursday, the House voted through a renewal of PATRIOT Act surveillance powers with minimal reforms, without allowing amendments, without regular committee process, and with only 60 minutes of debate.

Today, at 5:30pm, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell will hold a vote, hoping to get 60 Senators to agree to close debate on the same Act. But together with our allies in the Senate, he’s under heavy pressure, and he may not get there. Your call now to 202-224-3121 demanding your senators votes NO on cloture may make the difference to a wavering Senator, and will pile the pressure on.

If Sen. McConnell loses this vote, he will have to allow proper amendments and discussion. Please help make this happen.

Below is Restore The Fourth’s statement being circulated to Senators.

“Restore The Fourth strongly opposes cloture on the USA FREEDOM Reauthorization Act. As Reps. Davidson (R-OH) and Lofgren (D-CA) have observed in their letter to the Senate, it was unacceptable for House leaders to have brought this bill up outside of the regular committee process and with no opportunities for amendment. Senator Burr shockingly claimed, on Thursday, on the Senate floor, that President Trump “can do all of this [surveillance], without Congress’s permission;” a horrifying reassertion of the “unitary executive” theory that led to vast NSA and FBI overreach and abuse. Some amendment and some discussion is appropriate before cloture is invoked. Senators have the authority to debate the government’s surveillance powers freely and openly, and to offer such amendments as they see fit. By voting NO on cloture at 5:30pm today, you allow the opportunity for these awesome powers to receive the careful and due consideration that our Founders intended for the Senate to provide.”

Please make a call to 202-224-3121 NOW!

Stay updated on the fight for the Fourth Amendment. Follow us on Twitter @Restore_the4th.

The Fix Is In: House Votes Today on PATRIOT Act Renewal

Yesterday, on an hour or two’s notice, the Rules Committee of the House introduced and voted out a new bill renewing the government’s most controversial PATRIOT Act powers.

Rep. Warren Davidson (R-OH) described the bill as originating with a “coalition of intel hawks and some centrist Republicans and Democrats”. It is significantly weaker than the weak bill previously announced by Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY), who chairs the House Judiciary Committee. Nadler looked as if he was going to allow pro-civil-liberties amendments in markup to his bill. It looks like #Resistance Hero and ACLU Honoree Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), chair of House Intelligence, swung in to prevent that from happening, nixed the markup, and worked with hawkish Republicans to develop a text weak enough for the intelligence community to accept.

The key to threading this needle was in the complicated politics of surveillance reform in the Trump era. Trump has been angry for years about FBI surveillance, conducted under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, of people who worked on his campaign. Though the way he has talked about it has often been inaccurate, his concern pointed to real problems with how that surveillance was conducted. Broadly, it’s important to configure our intelligence collection systems so as to prevent intelligence agencies from gaining a whip hand over the politicians who are supposed to oversee them, and we have reason to suspect that the most pernicious elements of that surveillance may not be conducted using FISA at all. This in turn meant that hawkish Republicans, such as Rep. Devin Nunes, who chaired the House Intelligence Committee and who previously had shown no concerns whatsoever about mass surveillance, had an incentive in this round of debates to propose changes that would enable them to say that they had headed off the prospect of future surveillance of Trump-connected people. On their side, hawkish Democrats like Schiff and Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) wanted to preserve the government’s mass surveillance powers with as few as possible of the reforms demanded by younger, pro-civil-liberties Reps like Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA), Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-WA) or, God forbid, Rep. Justin Amash (I-MI).

Next, the House will vote on it today under a “closed rule”, which means that no amendments will be allowed; it has to be a straight up or down vote. Then, it’s off to the Senate, where McConnell will happily shoot down the idea of allowing amendments to improve the bill, through the well-known tactic of “filling the tree.” Then, the bill will hare off to Trump’s desk, and the PATRIOT Act will be safe from review for another few years.

This is all worth reviewing, not because pro-civil-liberties folks can affect it – indeed, the process is being designed explicitly so that we can’t – but because it’s illuminating evidence of who our friends and enemies are in the House. We can also see – from the changes surveillance hawks were most anxious to make – what kinds of surveillance abuses they’re most anxious to hide.

For example, Rep. Schiff seems especially anxious to block notice requirements that would mean that ordinary people found out whether their communications were being swept up in PATRIOT Act Section 215 surveillance programs. The natural deduction, as Marcy Wheeler puts it in her analysis, is that “DOJ has something to hide”; that, despite the suspension of the Call Detail Records program (the current incarnation of the call metadata program revealed by Edward Snowden), there is still something happening under Section 215 that would require notification to many more Americans than we might expect, that the government is surveilling their communications or business records.

Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR), a longtime proponent of surveillance reform, noted in a press release yesterday that the bill as it stands doesn’t “prohibit the government from digitally tracking Americans through their web browsing and internet search history without a warrant”, and “fails to clarify that the government cannot collect information like communications records and geo-location information outside the FISA process and beyond any judicial or congressional oversight.”

Basically, every protection in the bill has some sort of broadly worded exception for “national security” or if Attorney-General Bill Barr signs off on it. It’s hard to see this as any sort of progress for surveillance reform. Restore The Fourth opposes this bill and this process, and recommends the adoption of the far superior Safeguarding Americans’ Private Records Act, introduced in January.